OpenClaw and Hermes both put a personal AI assistant on a machine you control, and both are open source. Neither is built for a team. If you are choosing one assistant for yourself, the two are close. If you are choosing for a team, Kortix is open source and built for it.
Kortix is first because it is the one built for a team; both rivals are built for one operator.
Sources: Kortix docs at kortix.com/docs, OpenClaw at docs.openclaw.ai, Hermes at hermes-agent.nousresearch.com (checked October 2026).
Processes: sessions, one sandbox and branch eachFile system: the project repoPrograms: agents and skillsDrivers: connectorsScheduler: triggersPermissions: roles, grants and connector policiesThe Kortix docs map each part of an operating system to a feature a team runs on.
OpenClaw and Hermes are open-source personal agents that run on a machine you control and meet you in the chat apps you already use. Neither is built for a team, so the question of what is better only has an answer at personal scale. For one assistant you run yourself, the two do the same job with different emphases. For a team that needs shared memory, scoped permissions and review before work lands, the answer is Kortix, which is built for that scale.
OpenClaw is an open-source, self-hosted gateway that connects your chat apps to AI coding agents. You run one Gateway process on your own machine or a server, and it bridges your messaging apps to an always-available assistant. OpenClaw's documentation lists Discord, Google Chat, iMessage, Matrix, Microsoft Teams, Signal, Slack, Telegram, WhatsApp and Zalo among its channels, and its configuration lives in one file at ~/.openclaw/openclaw.json. The project is stewarded by the OpenClaw Foundation, an independent nonprofit, with no paid tier and no hosted service in the middle.
Hermes is an open-source AI agent built by Nous Research that runs on your own infrastructure, from a small VPS to serverless cloud. Hermes' documentation describes a personal agent with persistent memory across sessions, skills it writes for itself, built-in scheduling, and a messaging gateway that reaches more than twenty platforms from one process. It works with your own model or a hosted provider, and its install guide keeps the configuration and the memory on the machine you run it on.
Both projects sit at personal-agent scale and both keep their state on hardware you control. The difference is emphasis. OpenClaw is a gateway first: one process fans out to many chat channels, and one configuration file governs all of them. Hermes is a learning first: it writes and improves its own skills, curates memory across sessions, and spawns isolated subagents for parallel work. OpenClaw's security documentation states its trust model plainly: one gateway assumes one trusted boundary, a single operator or a team whose members trust each other, and the project is not built as a boundary between mutually adversarial users.
A personal agent stops fitting the moment more than one person needs to work with it. OpenClaw's own documentation says the same gateway runs as a shared team deployment, with configuration as the only difference, but that deployment still rests on one trusted boundary: one gateway, one configuration file, one set of credentials. Hermes adds specialist bots in group chats and still runs as one operator's agent. Neither gives each person their own scope, a shared company memory, or a record of who asked the agent to do what.
Kortix is the open-source AI Operating System: your agents, their skills, your company memory, and every connector in one git repo you own, with the agents working on real cloud computers. Where the two personal agents leave off, Kortix adds the parts a team runs on:
main through a change request. Merge is default-deny for agents.The comparison table on this page sets the three side by side. Teams comparing Kortix directly with OpenClaw can start from the Kortix vs OpenClaw comparison, and anyone new to the project can read what OpenClaw is. If you already run OpenClaw and want your agents to work for more than one person, migrating from OpenClaw is a supported path.
What the choice comes down to in practice.
Both are built for one operator. OpenClaw's docs say a shared team deployment runs inside one trusted boundary, and Hermes runs as one operator's agent with specialist bots. Neither adds per-person scope, a shared company memory or an audit of actions. A team that needs those is looking at Kortix.
Each keeps memory on the hardware you run it on. OpenClaw's gateway serves the operator's sessions, and Hermes curates memory across sessions for one user. Neither ships a company memory that many people build together in one governed repo, which Kortix does.
Kortix is open source. Agents, skills, company memory and connectors live in one git repo you own, each session runs on its own cloud computer, and session work reaches main through a change request a person approves. Self-host is free.
next
Self-host for free, or start on Kortix Cloud.
Open source · Any model, your keys · Self-host, VPC, or on-prem